Home > GM Foods Around the World > Europe's Reputation on GM Foods

Europe's Reputation on GM Foods

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 31 Aug 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Gm Foods Genetically Modified Farmers

Opinion on genetically modified (GM) foods can vary tremendously from one country to another. In particular, European sentiment is generally an anti-GM food one while in places such as the United States, there is much less opposition to the technology. These differences in opinion have led to some major clashes between countries, with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) having to become involved in some instances.

Public Mistrust

The widespread public mistrust in Britain and elsewhere in Europe has prompted long-term worries about GM foods and effects on human health and the environment. The government has actually responded to some degree with heavy rules and regulations on GM food production.

GM Regulations in Europe

These regulations have caused much anger and distress in the United States, where production of GM foods is high. With European imports of GM foods being so strictly monitored and assessed, Europe has been blamed for a huge drop in profits in America.

Anti-GM Sentiment

In fact, a WTO ruling did put Europeans in the 'wrong' in terms of their regulations being far too intense given the abundance of evidence that supposedly supports the safety of GM foods. The result is that Europe has gained a reputation of being anti-GM food, although perhaps rightly so.

Criticisms of Europe

One key criticism of Europe is that its strict regulations on GM production are holding back food aid in developing nations. One prominent public figure states that farmers in Africa could be growing ten times more food if they grew GM crops rather than traditional modes of farming.

He believes that the anti-GM sentiment is affecting the health of the populations in these developing countries. Instead, he says that rather than intensify food shortages with excessive GM foods regulations, we should be encouraging their use and playing a major part in their implementation and development.

Loss of Lives: Poverty and Malnutrition

It is thought that hundreds of thousands of lives are potentially lost due to malnutrition and poor food and water practices and access in these countries. The belief is that by using GM foods and related farming practices, this number can be dramatically reduced.

One problem that relates to the impact of these techniques is that Europe is somewhat 'obsessed' with organic products and farming methods. In an area where there is a food surplus, it's one thing to be choosy and embrace organic farming, despite its typically higher pricing and more challenging accessibility, depending on where a person resides.

However, in an area that experiences frequent famine and droughts, there needs to be a technology that provides massive food yields and production. By using GM technology, the idea is that developing nations can become more self-sufficient and less reliant on food aid.

Current and Future Issues

Today, European reputation remains a hard one in terms of the approach and opinion to GM foods – along with regulations. It does, however, seem that to some extent, Europe is being 'forced' to soften its views on GM foods, mainly due to pressure from the United States and other countries who see GM foods as vital for improving the future of farming and issues such as global poverty and malnutrition.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • capitalistic bastard
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    If god is real then he would accept all his children. Including the lizard people and the angry demimgod Xenu. And I think he would…
    27 April 2017
  • dunno
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Okay seriously calm down for one we don't know if god is real or not because we don't have solid proof except for "man's" word and we…
    25 April 2017
  • dragonhunter
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    i think that they can help alot.
    24 April 2017
  • Communist66642069
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Why is everyone ignoring the fact that regarldess of the GMOs There are alien lizards ruling our governmentthey are the only god in…
    4 April 2017
  • fc222 IS WRONG
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Attention. I have made another mistake. I assure that this will not happen again, and I thank you for your understanding. The previous…
    31 March 2017
  • poopy
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    this is a very cool they i love it its amazing
    30 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    This is the nickname I meant to set in my previous statement. I apear to have made a mistake, which will not happen again
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    In this essay, I aim to explain why feministchristian222 has lied to you all. My first point is that God is decisively not real. After…
    29 March 2017
  • Heavenlord666
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    I agree with feminist christian. My son is now gay.
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    gm crops are against the bibles rules. we should never mess with the eternal one's plan for us. if he says that normal rice should make…
    29 March 2017
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the GeneticallyModifiedFoods website. Please read our Disclaimer.