Home > GM Foods Around the World > Austria and GM Food Bans

Austria and GM Food Bans

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 30 Aug 2012 | comments*Discuss
Gm Genetically Modified Maize Strain

Banning genetically modified (GM) foods in Europe is a bit of a complicated process because EU law explains that a national ban is only justified if specific conditions are met. In Austria, a recent ban on GM maize has led to debate and controversy over the technology and the right of individual country members to ban GM foods.

Lifting the Ban

Despite previous attempts to have Austria's ban removed – similar to attempts in other countries such as Hungary – both Hungary and Austria have banned a certain kind of GM maize that was developed and marketed by Monsanto, which is a biotechnology company based in the United States.

On top of that, Austria had also banned another kind of maize that is made by the German pharmaceutical company Bayer. Despite attempts to have the bans lifted, Austria has maintained the bans on these GM foods. Austrians have been pleased and felt that their efforts have been well worth it.

EU Consumer Opinion

The desire for EU country bans on GM foods is not at all surprising given that consumers in Europe have generally been the slowest to latch onto the GM food craze. They are generally very sceptical of the technology and have approached it with mistrust and intense caution. In fact, laws and regulations in Europe are some of the strictest in the world, partly in response to the public mistrust of this technology.

However, the biotechnology industry maintains that GM foods are safe and that the technology is important to support the food needs of our world in the future. Still, the words are not significant enough to convince Austria to lift its ban.

Environmental Groups

Environmental groups have been angered by the attempts to have Austria's bans on the maize lifted. They feel it has been a case of bullying and unjust pressure on Austria. They key aspect of the debate has been that Austria must show scientific evidence to justify that their ban is a reasonable one.

As such, Austria has claimed that there are questions about the effect of the maize on fertility as well as on insect resistance to the maize. There have also been concerns voiced about the effects on butterflies. It is Austria's argument that safeguarding human and environmental health is a top priority and that these particular strains of GM maize have not yet demonstrated safety.

Safety of GM Foods

As many environmental groups can attest, a major part of the debate is the question of reasonable safety. These groups tend to support significant caution, meaning that until GM foods can be shown as safe, they should not be used. One of the problems we have is that GM foods have not been subject to much long-term data. We still don't know about their effects on humans and the environment in the future.

Confusing Study Results

Other studies have raised safety concerns but these are inconclusive. It seems that for each study indicating GM foods are safe, there is another suggesting it may cause harm. We generally have so many factors influencing these studies that it's difficult to perform an accurate, robust study to show exactly whether a GM product is suitable for production and consumption.

For now, however, Austria is citing their concern for health and ecological and environmental safety as reasonable grounds for their ban on the GM maize. Their ban will likely not be lifted anytime soon although it will probably continue to fuel debate and controversy on the subject.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

(never shown)
(never shown)
(never shown)
(never shown)
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • capitalistic bastard
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    If god is real then he would accept all his children. Including the lizard people and the angry demimgod Xenu. And I think he would…
    27 April 2017
  • dunno
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Okay seriously calm down for one we don't know if god is real or not because we don't have solid proof except for "man's" word and we…
    25 April 2017
  • dragonhunter
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    i think that they can help alot.
    24 April 2017
  • Communist66642069
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Why is everyone ignoring the fact that regarldess of the GMOs There are alien lizards ruling our governmentthey are the only god in…
    4 April 2017
  • fc222 IS WRONG
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Attention. I have made another mistake. I assure that this will not happen again, and I thank you for your understanding. The previous…
    31 March 2017
  • poopy
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    this is a very cool they i love it its amazing
    30 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    This is the nickname I meant to set in my previous statement. I apear to have made a mistake, which will not happen again
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    In this essay, I aim to explain why feministchristian222 has lied to you all. My first point is that God is decisively not real. After…
    29 March 2017
  • Heavenlord666
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    I agree with feminist christian. My son is now gay.
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    gm crops are against the bibles rules. we should never mess with the eternal one's plan for us. if he says that normal rice should make…
    29 March 2017
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the GeneticallyModifiedFoods website. Please read our Disclaimer.