Home > Other Issues in GM Foods > Greenhouse Gases and GM Foods

Greenhouse Gases and GM Foods

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 31 Aug 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Gm Foods Genetically Modified Greenhouse

When you think about farming, you might imagine that all of that lush green space and those sprawling fields of crops are harmless to the environment. If anything, you may see them as contributing to a more environmentally friendly world.

Farming and the Environment

The truth, however, is far from a benign one. Farming actually affects global warming more than the collective result of the world's vehicles, trains, boats and aeroplanes. Rather than carbon being the culprit, the main issue is nitrogen.

Nitrogen fertiliser is a greenhouse gas. Yet now, there are suggestions about the best way to reduce greenhouse gases produced by farming practices.

Reducing Greenhouse Gases

One school of thought is that genetically modified (GM) crops could ultimately reduce the nitrogen aspect of farming. By modifying crops so that they don't need as much fertiliser, greenhouse gases could potentially be reduced. Some scientists believe that GM crops can truly be ecologically friendly ones.

However, GM crops are far from being a globally accepted technology, which means that even with significant, positive results, it will take a lot of education and convincing to fully 'sell' the product to the public.

Nitrogen Efficiency

Since yields of crops typically require very large amounts of nitrogen fertiliser, the idea is to reduce the use of the fertiliser by engineering a crop that thrives without the vast quantities. The production usually ends up giving off enormous quantities of carbon dioxide. On top of that, the nitrogen also causes contamination to soil and water.

In fact, atmospheric nitrous oxide has gone up almost twenty percent due to modern agricultural methods. This rise has been triggered by nitrogen fertiliser, which then leads to greenhouse gases. It's a difficult issue because farming is such a mainstay for all of us. It's not as though we can simply reduce yields – quite the opposite, in fact.

A Potential Solution

The solution would require a gene for a particular enzyme that plays a role in producing proteins. This gene helps the plant obtain more nitrogen from the soil. One study thus far found that GM oilseed rape gave good yields on only one third of the usual amount of fertiliser.

New Ways to Improve Farming

While producing a GM crop that requires less nitrogen fertiliser is one approach to bring down the level of greenhouse gases, another approach is to modify farming practices. Just the way that a fertiliser is applied or the time it is applied can impact emissions. Overall though, nitrogen efficient crops appear to be the approach with the most potential for reducing greenhouse gases.

From a financial perspective, if this GM technology does prove successful, then it will mean immense financial gains as many countries become keen to meet their environmental targets and reduce greenhouse gases.

Europe and GM Crops

While Europe has overall been less than favourable to GM crops, some think that when climate change and the environment are factored into the equation, there may be less opposition to the technology. For now, the controversy over GM crops is still going strong and only time will tell if GM varieties created to reduce greenhouse gases are a successful reality.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • capitalistic bastard
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    If god is real then he would accept all his children. Including the lizard people and the angry demimgod Xenu. And I think he would…
    27 April 2017
  • dunno
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Okay seriously calm down for one we don't know if god is real or not because we don't have solid proof except for "man's" word and we…
    25 April 2017
  • dragonhunter
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    i think that they can help alot.
    24 April 2017
  • Communist66642069
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Why is everyone ignoring the fact that regarldess of the GMOs There are alien lizards ruling our governmentthey are the only god in…
    4 April 2017
  • fc222 IS WRONG
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    Attention. I have made another mistake. I assure that this will not happen again, and I thank you for your understanding. The previous…
    31 March 2017
  • poopy
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    this is a very cool they i love it its amazing
    30 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    This is the nickname I meant to set in my previous statement. I apear to have made a mistake, which will not happen again
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    In this essay, I aim to explain why feministchristian222 has lied to you all. My first point is that God is decisively not real. After…
    29 March 2017
  • Heavenlord666
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    I agree with feminist christian. My son is now gay.
    29 March 2017
  • feministchristian222
    Re: Fact Sheet: Pros vs Cons
    gm crops are against the bibles rules. we should never mess with the eternal one's plan for us. if he says that normal rice should make…
    29 March 2017
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the GeneticallyModifiedFoods website. Please read our Disclaimer.